Journal: BMJ Glob Health.
Lead Author: Bardosh et al.
Original date of publication: 05/25/2022
Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9136690/
Keywords: adverse eventsboosterscivil rightscoercioncovid vaccinationEpidemiologyEthicsmyocarditis. mRNArisk
Full Author List: Kevin Bardosh, Alex de Figueiredo, Rachel Gur-Arie, Euzebiusz Jamrozik, James Doidge, Trudo Lemmens, Salmaan Keshavjee, Janice E Graham, Stefan Baral
Lead Author: Bardosh et al.
Original date of publication: 05/25/2022
Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9136690/
Summary Context
Argues against using mandating of mRNA covid vaccination given questionable science and likelihood of backlash.
Comments
This analysis outlines the unintended consequences from mandating vaccines, the questionable science underlying such decisions, and analyzes why this is so, through the lens of ” (1) behavioural psychology, (2) politics and law, (3) socioeconomics, and (4) the integrity of science and public health”
Abstract or Results, Key Passages
“Policymakers should reflect on the necessity of enforcing what is essentially a new two-tier, segregated social system and how this will affect different social groups now and into the future—behaviourally, politically and socioeconomically—as well as the impact of such policies on the integrity of science and public health itself.”
Keywords: adverse eventsboosterscivil rightscoercioncovid vaccinationEpidemiologyEthicsmyocarditis. mRNArisk
Full Author List: Kevin Bardosh, Alex de Figueiredo, Rachel Gur-Arie, Euzebiusz Jamrozik, James Doidge, Trudo Lemmens, Salmaan Keshavjee, Janice E Graham, Stefan Baral
