Recent controversy over the claim that the covid vaccines are laden with numerous undeclared substances has spawned numerous studies, conferences, and discussions—all pointing to signs that these products are contaminated and thus inherently unsafe.
These discoveries have revealed the presence of a variety of potential contaminants, including bacterial DNA (plasmids), a cancer-promoting genetic sequence (SV40), and all kinds of heavy metals that should not be in vaccines or in any substance being injected into the body.
In 2021, Moderna issued a recall for 1.63 million vaccine doses in Japan after "[stainless] steel particle" contaminants were found.
One week later, Japan reported another instance of tainted Moderna vaccines vials, which the company confirmed but said posed no health risk.
While these revelations about "corrupted" covid vaccines raise grave and justifiable concerns regarding the safety of these recently rolled-out experimental vaccines, contaminated vaccines have been known to exist long before mRNA jabs were foisted on the public.
In January 2017, a team of scientists from three organizations—[1] International Clean Water Institute (USA), [2] National Research Council of Italy's Institute for the Science and Technology of Ceramics (Italy), and [3] Nanodiagnostics srl (Italy)—published a study led by Dr. Antonietta Gatti and titled "New quality-control investigations on vaccines: micro- and nanocontamination." The study revealed that nanoparticles were contaminating nearly all the vaccines they examined.
Dr. Gatti is an Italian physicist and bioengineer and a celebrated figure in the world of nanopathologies and nanotoxicology. Among her many accomplishments, she has been recognized by the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an expert in nanotechnologies. She is a member of the European Scientific Commission on Medicinal Products and Medical Devices, a past professor of Biomaterials at the Faculty of Biosciences and Biotechnologies at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, and in charge of the Laboratory of Biomaterials.
Using an environmental scanning electron microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe, Dr. Gatti and her research team analyzed 44 samples of 30 "traditional" vaccines coming from two countries (Italy and France) and found dangerous contaminants, including metal toxicants, in 43 of the 44 samples tested. The team reported:
"[Further] analyses of those particles revealed them to be 'non-biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies' composed of lead, stainless steel, chromium, tungsten, nickel, iron, zirconium, hafnium, strontium, antimony and other metals."
During a World Council for Health Discussion posted to Rumble on June 23, 2025, Dr. Gatti revisited her 2017 landmark discovery of "metallic contaminants" in "normal vaccines":
"Probably nobody knows that before Covid era, I have evaluated the vaccines. The normal vaccines, not the new drugs. And I found a lot of contaminants, also metallic contaminants. By 2018, verified as a presence of nanoparticle micro and nanoparticle inside the vaccines. Barium sulfate, aluminum, stainless steel, tungsten carbide. They were already present in the normal vaccines."
When interviewed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Children's Health Defense back in 2017, Dr. Antonietta Gatti explained her surprise at finding these vaccine impurities:
"The particles . . . are not supposed to be there."
"We had never questioned the purity of vaccines before. In fact, for us the problem did not even exist. All injectable solutions had to be perfectly pure and that was an act of faith on which it seemed impossible to have doubts. For that reason, we repeated our analyses several times to be certain. In the end, we accepted the evidence."
In an article updated for LewRockwell.com in November 2023, Jon Rappaport described Dr. Gatti's 2017 inquiry as "the vaccine study that should have brought down the empire." He posed the question, "Does the standard manufacturing process for traditional vaccines INEVITABLY lead to dangerous and destructive nano-contamination?"
According to the aforementioned CHD article by RFK Jr.:
"Asked to explain how the contamination got into the vaccines, Dr. Gatti replied, 'That's a question we can't answer. We would need to inspect the laboratories where vaccines are produced, but no pharmaceutical company would allow us to do so.'"
Sanofi Pasteur, a manufacturer of one of the contaminated vaccines, dismissed Gatti's findings as impossible, RFK's piece notes.
Instead of being acclaimed for revealing that vaccines contained more than the listed inorganic chemicals, Gatti's research team was subjected to having their laboratory raided and their computers and documents seized. That February 22, 2018, confiscation came just days before Dr. Gatti was to present her findings to the courts in Lanusei, Italy. As a result, she and her husband, Dr. Stefano Montanari, who assisted in the research, had to cancel a series of planned conferences and teaching events that they had set up to discuss their findings.
Now, seven years after her research was effectively "disappeared" and her opportunity to do further scientific inquiry on the subject was lost, the introduction of the mRNA technology has caused Dr. Gatti's work to resurface.
One of the silver linings of the mass destruction wrought by the covid-era vaccine dictates is that many more people around the world have awakened to how potentially dangerous and how completely untested all vaccines truly are.
The recent curiosity about the contents of the experimental mRNA products has now extended into the entire vaccine industry and has inspired more and more people to ask, "What's in that vial?"
Putting aside the argument made by some that vaccines themselves are contaminants, Dr. Gatti's 2017 study demonstrated a troubling amount of contamination in numerous "traditional" vaccines and has engendered numerous questions beyond the contents of the vial:
- How can a vaccine be properly studied if there are a host of unknown ingredients in it?
- How can a vaccine be deemed "safe" if there are unlisted and untested ingredients in the product—particularly if some of those ingredients are considered non-biocompatible?
- If there are unknown contaminants in the vaccines, how are they getting in there and can the manufacturing process be trusted?
- Are certain vaccine side effects caused by nanoparticle contamination?
Dr. Gatti's study showed, beyond the particulars of her research, that there are some serious unanswered questions about what is in all vaccines and that there are influential forces trying to keep this information from seeing the light of day.
If sufficient and accurate information about the ingredients of a medical product is not provided, that makes assessing the potential risks of the product virtually impossible.
Without the ability to evaluate a product's risks, there is no informed consent.
Once informed consent is vacated, the ethical responsibilities of the medical establishment are rendered meaningless.
The solution to the question of vaccine contamination is simple. An independent and transparent body that regularly tests the contents of all vaccines must be established.
Full knowledge of the ingredients in these products is more than a matter of an industry taking responsibility. Knowing the truth about what we are putting into our bodies is a fundamental human right.
Also see Dr. Gatti's interview on our podcast Conversations on Health Freedom discussing her research documenting the frightening impact of nanoparticles on our health.
