On Friday, February 7, 2025, a bill calling for the ban of mRNA vaccines in the State of Montana was discussed during the state legislature’s House Judiciary Committee meeting.
A week earlier, on January 31, State Rep. Greg Kmetz (R-Miles City) had introduced House Bill 371 with the support of a dozen other Republicans. Three days later the bill passed through the Judiciary Committee.
Then came the February 7th hearing by the same committee. It lasted over two hours and included compelling statements by proponents of HB 371 about the devastating impact of the covid mRNA inoculation program. The testimony included numerous instances of specific, severe, detrimental effects the testifiers had witnessed firsthand. Some of the testimony came from individuals in the healthcare industry.
Not all the testimony was oral. Beforehand, Rep. Kmetz had informed committee members that he had “a giant pile of handouts” from people who had registered to testify in writing to the harms they had experienced or witnessed from the covid shots. He requested that a clerk pass out these written statements to the committee. After his request was granted, Judiciary Committee members had the opportunity to read a number of documents attesting to serious physical and mental injuries the covid shots had caused.
In one of the more powerful in-person presentations, Christine Drivdahl-Smith, a family physician in Miles City, called mRNA vaccines “the most destructive and lethal medical products that have ever been used in human history.” She highlighted the fact that by the end of 2024 more than 37,000 deaths from COVID-19 vaccination had been reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Database (VAERS). But if anything, she pointed out, those adverse events were under-reported by a factor of 31 to 100.
Other backers of the bill noted the covid program’s many drawbacks:
- the lack of long-term safety studies on the product;
- the absence of informed consent, which left the public in the dark about all aspects of this brand-new, barely trialed product;
- the use of coercion during the “vaccine” rollout—a practice that violated ethical considerations and possibly legal codes;
- and numerous other missteps associated with the mRNA products manufactured by either Pfizer (with German mRNA developer BioNTech) or Moderna.
The pushback against mRNA injections from state legislators didn’t start in Montana nor has it ended in Montana.
Mere days ago, on February 12th, Kentucky followed suit. Ten sponsors in the Kentucky legislature brought forth House Bill 469. It calls for a ban on the administration of “any human gene therapy product for any infectious disease indication, regardless of whether the administration is termed an immunization, vaccine, or any other term.”
These two latest initiatives bring the total of US states with bills or proposals supporting a ban on mRNA vaccines to eight. A ninth, Tennessee, recently tabled its proposal.
Another bill to keep an eye on is Idaho Senate Senate Bill 1036, which was introduced to that body’s Health and Welfare Committee in late January. SB 1036 seeks to establish a moratorium on certain uses of human gene therapy products in order to “protect Idaho adults and children from the adverse effects of experimental gene therapy and biologic products utilized as immunizations.” The bill was named “The Doug Cameron Act” in honor of an Idaho rancher who was severely injured immediately after receiving a covid-19 genetic immunization encouraged by his employer.
Just before this article was published, we learned that Louisiana Surgeon General Ralph Abraham ordered his staff to stop engaging with media campaigns and community efforts that encourage vaccinations. In a memo to “Team Members” of the Louisiana Department of Health (LDH), Dr. Abraham declared, “While we encourage each patient to discuss the risks and benefits of vaccination with their provider, LDH will no longer promote mass vaccination.”
In a separate, strongly worded letter, Abraham went even further, challenging the ideology of the “greater good,” recognizing that “our rights come to us as individuals,” and advising that “[w]e should reject this utilitarian approach and restore medical decision-making to its proper place: between doctors and patients.”
The growing call to ban mRNA vaccines and to remove the government from our personal medical decisions comes amidst increasing concerns about the expansion of the experimental mRNA technology into countless areas of the medical industry and even into food products.
As noted by Rep. Kmetz during the Montana hearings, HB 371 only narrowly addresses the mRNA covid vaccine. The public needs to be aware, he said, that very soon many other vaccines and medical products will be utilizing mRNA technologies if the pharmaceutical industry has its way.
These “gene therapies” are currently being hyped as a “versatile drug modality” not just for infectious diseases but also for a multitude of other non-infectious pathologies and physiological processes deemed “treatable” with mRNA vaccines and mRNA therapeutics.
Now that the mRNA imperative has been birthed, it is being pushed on the back of massive investment in this platform and based on the perceived endless opportunities to make money from it. The med-tech biopharma Utopia seeks to develop more and more kinds of mRNA vaccines and other products that have the vaccine sobriquet. The goal is to pull all of these concoctions into the vaccine manufacturers’ immunity-from-liability arena as quickly as possible.
Lest you take this subject too lightly, realize that there are literally hundreds of new products in the pipeline—things that you would never think of as having anything to do with vaccines. Click on the above link to access VaccineToday’s article about the endless possibilities for the development of vaccines to fight everything from cancer to superbugs to diseases said to be connected to climate change.
If the introduction of the mRNA vaccines during the manufactured covid crisis was an attempt by corporations to normalize public acceptance of this new biopharmaceutical mRNA medical model of financialized “disease management,” it appears to have backfired. The sleeping giant of public resistance to the Big Pharma juggernaut has awakened. Calls for a moratorium on mRNA Vaccines are gaining momentum.
Not only are more people questioning the madness of all things mRNA, but signs abound that people around the planet are questioning the credibility of the vaccine program. They have lost faith in public health agencies and have become increasingly distrustful of their personal physician. Some might recognize this hopeful trend as a redeployment of long-absent critical thinking skills.
The recent bills introduced in Montana, Kentucky, Idaho, and elsewhere are clear and growing indications that “we the people” are fed up with being treated as lab rats for Big Pharma’s mRNA mad scientists and are no longer willing to be fodder for the entire medical industry’s greedy profiteers.
