Another significant data set chronicling adverse events related to Pfizer’s Covid vaccine has just been released upon request by the European Medicines Agency.
This recently disclosed 396 page report titled, “Periodic Safety Update Report #3 for ACTIVE SUBSTANCE: Covid 19 mRNA vaccine (nucleoside modified) (BNT162b2)” is important for both its scope and specificity.
The most significant section embedded in this report, Appendix 2.2: “Cumulative and Interval Tabulation of Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Reactions from Post-Marketing Data Sources,” examines in granular detail the numbers and varieties of adverse events connected to the vaccine.
An initial evaluation of the documents raises multiple concerns and provokes numerous important questions.
The cumulative total of adverse events cited in the period December 2020 to June 2022 is nearly 5 million with over 10,000 types of events recorded of varying degrees and severity.
A small sample of types and totals of adverse events listed in Pfizer’s report:
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders: 100,970
Cardiac Disorders: 126,193
Ear and Labyrinth Disorders: 47,038
Endocrine Disorders: 4,115
Eye Disorders: 61,518
GastroIntestinal Orders: 317,811
Immune System Disorders: 31,895
Infections and Infestations: 167,382
Injury, Poisoning, Procedural, Complication: 241,342
Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders: 539,299
Nervous System Disorders: 696,508
Renal and Urinary Disorders: 13,647
Reproductive System and Breast Disorders: 178,353
Respiratory, Thoracic & mediastinal Disorders: 190,720
Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders: 224,633
Vascular Disorders: 73,542
While the above listing by itself depicts a troubling scenario, the examples listed scarcely scratch the surface- see source documents to get a sense for the magnitude of the situation.
In combination with previously reported documents related to Pfizer Covid vaccines, obtained by ICAN and Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, a disturbing picture begins to emerge.
A preliminary inspection of this latest trove of documents raises serious questions which demand immediate answers.
Precisely HOW did Pfizer accumulate this data ‘post marketing’?
If these are Pfizer’s own ‘in-house’ records and resulting declarations, can we be assured that this data is an accurate accounting of all adverse events?
How soon did Pfizer have this symptoms list?
Did they supply the top 10 list to the V-safe “check-the-box” options? If they did not supply it, why not? If they did, why wasn’t it included?
As this data only covers thru June 2022, what are the current, updated numbers? Are there appreciably more injuries which are not recorded?
Additional questions remain to be answered.
While analyses from this recent release are in its early stages, initial impressions suggest we have another compelling piece of evidence that the Covid-19 shots are dangerous to human health and should be removed from the market.
Stay tuned.
